Tom Lane wrote:
It seemed a tad excessive to me, at least for routine regression
testing. What do you think of making it a separate test script and
adding it to "make bigcheck", as we did once with the numeric_big tests?
I'm not sure I see the point: I would guess that the rate at which we're
exp
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uh, opinions on this? We don't normally test every feature of a
> command, do we?
It seemed a tad excessive to me, at least for routine regression
testing. What do you think of making it a separate test script and
adding it to "make bigcheck", as we di
Uh, opinions on this? We don't normally test every feature of a
command, do we?
---
Koju Iijima wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> We found that one of RT items "namespace" has only few test cases.
> So I added more test cases t
