Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Patch applied. Thanks.
>
> I suspect the point was that limits.h is needed *instead of* math.h,
> not *in addition to*. How many of those headers had math.h before?
The issue was that an include file included another include file t
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Patch applied. Thanks.
I suspect the point was that limits.h is needed *instead of* math.h,
not *in addition to*. How many of those headers had math.h before?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
I think that Bruce thought that defines INT_MAX and related
symbols, whereas the spec is perfectly clear that they're in
. However, that's where they are on my machines, and yet CVS
tip is not failing for me. I'm not clear why not... What platform
are y
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent
> > include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all
> > system headers rule and I'm still not sure what changed that broke
> > everything, but
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent
> include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all
> system headers rule and I'm still not sure what changed that broke
> everything, but if people need to get work
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Kris Jurka wrote:
>
> The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent
> include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all
> system headers rule and I'
