[PATCHES] postgresql.conf formatting cleanup

I have applied the following patch to improve the formating of postgresql.conf.sample. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup

[PATCHES] nitpick consistency patch for pg_dump.c

This is a totally trivial patch for something that was a very minor nit that annoyed me the other day while I was documenting my current project. It makes pg_dump use the same layout for types as for tables, by putting "\n\t" before the first field and "\n" before the final ");" Can't really just

Re: [PATCHES] Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster

Here is a patch that adds a Rendezvous GUC variable to set the Rendezvous name. Chris, would you please test this and let me know how it works. I know we are past cutoff, but I want to get Rendezvous completely functional. I didn't bother with conditionally including it in postgresql.conf becau

Re: [PATCHES] nitpick consistency patch for pg_dump.c

trivial or not the patch was broken. *sigh*. it's been a long day. This patch will work. sorry andrew RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c,v retrieving revision 1.335 diff -c -w -r1.335 pg_dump.c *** pg_dump.c 25 Jun 2003 04:08:19 - 1.335 --- pg_dump.c

[PATCHES] pg_ping(1) utility...

I've attached a chump little utility called pg_ping(1) and the necessary update to pg_ctl(1) to see if a database is up and running or not. There are three things that I haven't completed with this that I'll try and get to the next time I have a small chunk of time available: 1) I'd hoped to add

Re: [PATCHES] PERL (fwd)

I was dealing with SCO on PG issues, and they supplied the following patch against 7.3.3 for SCO OSR5. Can it be massaged for 7.4? LER Forwarded Message Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 13:09:40 -0700 From: Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [PATCHES] [NOVICE] connectby(... pos_of_sibling)

I can not find any patch from that date with your name on it, and I can't find a patch at all with connectby from you. Of course, please repost it if you have it (archives are down), but then again, where has the patch gone? Why isn't it in my mailbox? --

Re: [PATCHES] "fix" for plpgsql polymorphism

I'm going to resend the patches that I have outstanding since it appears some may have been lost. Here's the first. == Tom Lane wrote: You can alias $0, similar to the argument variables. And, I confirmed that you cannot change the value, similar to the ar

Re: [PATCHES] [NOVICE] connectby(... pos_of_sibling)

I'm going to resend the patches that I have outstanding since it appears some may have been lost. Here's the second of three. Nabil Sayegh wrote: Am Son, 2003-06-22 um 02.09 schrieb Joe Conway: Sounds like all that's needed for your case. But t

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

I'm going to resend the patches that I have outstanding since it appears some may have been lost. Here's the third of three. === Tom Lane wrote: Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ISTM that "source" is worth knowing. Hm, possibly. Any other opi