Tom Lane said:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Jari Aalto wrote:
>>> I made a mistake while running 7.4 under W2k/Cygwin, so perhaps the
>>> patch would give user a little more comfort.
>
>> I don't see how. Please explain.
>
> CVS-tip initdb seems to be written to suppress any t
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 13:34, Tom Lane wrote:
how far back do they have support
for these RL_PROMPT_foo symbols, and do we need to consider the
possibility that the symbols aren't there or act differently?
Short answer: I believe that any readline newer than Feb 1999 oughta work.
The RL_PRO
Attached is the patch I just applied to CVS HEAD to fix the search_path
problem that Olivier Prenant recently identified (can't set a search
path for another database if it mentions schemas not present in the
current database). I am looking for comments on whether to back-patch
this into REL7_4_ST
Reece Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The RL_PROMPT_* markers are undocumented features of readline. The patch
> I sent works fine with RL 4.2 and 4.3 on linux-x86. From the readline
> changelogs, I deduced that these were added with 4.0 (ca. Feb 1999).
Hm. I don't recall whether we still pret
Attached is a patch that fixes some trivial typos and alignment. Please
apply.
--
Alvaro Herrera ()
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca" (Orual)
diff -cr --exclude=CVS 00orig/src/backend/access/transam/xact.c
01trivial/src/backend/access/transam/xact.c
*** 00orig
I attach a small patch that slightly refactors some code in
storage/smgr/smgr.c. Regression test pass. There's no change in
functionality, only code reordering. (Well, it changes an ad-hoc linked
list into a proper List).
Please review and if Ok, apply.
--
Alvaro Herrera ()
"At least to kerne
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Well, it changes an ad-hoc linked
> list into a proper List).
Why? AFAICT that just makes the code bigger, uglier, and slower ...
I am pretty dubious of PendingDeletesBeginXact, too, and of moving this
list out of TopMemoryContext. Please justify.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:20:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (Well, it changes an ad-hoc linked
> > list into a proper List).
>
> Why? AFAICT that just makes the code bigger, uglier, and slower ...
Oh, does it? Hmm.
When I originally wrote this, it
