Dear Tom,
Attached is a proposed patch that fixes the
cursor-position-in-CREATE-FUNCTION issue per my earlier suggestion.
The re-parsing of the original command is simplistic but will handle all
normal cases.
[...]
That's quite a demonstration;-)
However, I still stick with my bad simple
--On Friday, March 19, 2004 09:18:03 -0600 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--On Friday, March 19, 2004 10:15:56 -0500 Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[moved to -patches because of the patch]
--On Friday, March 19, 2004 08:01:53 -0500 Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I can work that up. Out of curiosity are the plain text files
generated from the html files? Also I noticed that not all plain text
FAQ's have html FAQ's associated with them... is that by design or just
the fact that no one has bothered to bring them up to speed?
Robert Treat
On
Robert Treat wrote:
I think I can work that up. Out of curiosity are the plain text files
generated from the html files? Also I noticed that not all plain text
FAQ's have html FAQ's associated with them... is that by design or just
the fact that no one has bothered to bring them up to speed?
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In other words, the entire application either is or is not linked with
threads; it's not a property of an individual library.
SO, IF we are using the threads flags, we need to use them on ALL=20
libpq-using programs, ours or the users.
Yeek. This is
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In other words, the entire application either is or is not linked with
threads; it's not a property of an individual library.
SO, IF we are using the threads flags, we need to use them on ALL=20
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Yes, his patch ended up adding this to THREAD_LIBS, but
template/unixware has:
For gcc:
THREAD_CPPFLAGS=-pthread
and for non-gcc:
THREAD_CPPFLAGS=-K pthread
Larry, are these wrong?
Nope, those work, and should be passed to any libpq-using
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Yes, his patch ended up adding this to THREAD_LIBS, but
template/unixware has:
For gcc:
THREAD_CPPFLAGS=-pthread
and for non-gcc:
THREAD_CPPFLAGS=-K pthread
Larry, are these wrong?
Nope,
