On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:18:11 -0500, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Didn't we do that already?
No :( I promised to do it a couple of weeks ago but could not get to do it.
Now with Magnus's help I finaly did it. The last patch should be fine.
> regards, tom lane
Nic
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Should the relation overflow be a WARNING or a LOG? ...
> > I'd go for making them both LOG, I think. More consistent.
>
> Can we also update this wording:
>
> INFO: free space map: 52 r
