[Please CC any replies, thanks]
This patch is the beginnings of support for COLLATE. I need to do some
other work for a few days so I'm posting here to get some initial
reviews. Various parts are marked [done] and [not done].
The steps involved are:
- Add COLLATE to grammer as part of expression
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:12:12PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> No, and in fact the terminology mixup in your patch and description
> concerns me. If you are talking about collation, then the data types,
> system catalog columns, etc. should talk about collation, not about
> "locale", becau
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> - Should LOCALE be created as a synonym for COLLATE? It reads more
> naturally.
No, and in fact the terminology mixup in your patch and description
concerns me. If you are talking about collation, then the data types,
system catalog columns, etc. should talk ab
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Look at the POSIX interface, look at ICU. They both provide collate
> order *and* date/time formats *and* number formatting. Pretending
> they're seperate is silly.
I'm not pretending. They *are* separate. That's why you can set them
separately.
--
Peter Eisent
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:04:42AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > Look at the POSIX interface, look at ICU. They both provide collate
> > order *and* date/time formats *and* number formatting. Pretending
> > they're seperate is silly.
>
> I'm not pretending. Th
