Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] statement logging / extended query protocol issues

2005-09-25 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 21:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Here are comments on this posting and the patch (it is long): Thanks for reading through this. I understand now why nobody had gone into this detail before... > > (1) > > > Parse (unnamed statement) "SELECT * from pg_proc" > > > Bind (

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] statement logging / extended query protocol

2005-09-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 21:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Here are comments on this posting and the patch (it is long): > > Thanks for reading through this. I understand now why nobody had gone > into this detail before... > > > > (1) > > > > Parse (unnamed statement) "SE

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] statement logging / extended query protocol

2005-09-25 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > OK. At this stage it should all just wait for 8.2. Haven't we already committed some feature changes in this area? I dislike the idea of shipping a transient state just because "we ran out of time". Once we ship 8.1, that will be another behavior that we have to conside

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] statement logging / extended query protocol

2005-09-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > OK. At this stage it should all just wait for 8.2. > > Haven't we already committed some feature changes in this area? I > dislike the idea of shipping a transient state just because "we ran out > of time". Once we ship 8.1, that will be another beha