Re: [PATCHES] Translation updates: pt_BR

2005-10-06 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: > > If you want we could also replicate the older branches in the > > pgtranslation repository. Is there interest in that? > > I think so. At least those branches that are maintained yet. OK, I'll try to do that but I have to figure out how to retroactively inser

Re: [PATCHES] Translation updates: pt_BR

2005-10-06 Thread Euler Taveira de Oliveira
--- Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: > > > If you want we could also replicate the older branches in the > > > pgtranslation repository. Is there interest in that? > > > > I think so. At least those branches that are maintained yet. > > OK, I'll

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Best practices: MERGE

2005-10-06 Thread Neil Conway
On Tue, 2005-04-10 at 09:41 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > Could you apply this to the 8.0 docs, too? Applied, with fixes. -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail c

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction

2005-10-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
> I'm not a member of this list (yet), so please CC me on responses and > discussion. The patch below seems to be completion of work already > started, because the boolean remoteTrFlag was already defined, and all I > had to add was its setting and two references. I hope someone will find > it usef

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction

2005-10-06 Thread David Fetter
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:38:54PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I'm not a member of this list (yet), so please CC me on responses > > and discussion. The patch below seems to be completion of work > > already started, because the boolean remoteTrFlag was already > > defined, and all I had to add

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction

2005-10-06 Thread Tom Lane
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:38:54PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I don't know if people want this for 8.1 or 8.2. > 8.1, IMHO. It's a bug fix. :) Not unless Joe Conway signs off on it ... regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction

2005-10-06 Thread David Fetter
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:31:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:38:54PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I don't know if people want this for 8.1 or 8.2. > > > 8.1, IMHO. It's a bug fix. :) > > Not unless Joe Conway signs off on