Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> > Is anybody working or considering to work on pg_upgrade, or is all this
> > hypothetical? Our past history has seen lots of people offering to work
> > on pg_upgrade, and none has produced a working version. Is it fair or
> > useful to impose
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Let's go ahead and apply the patch. While this change isn't very
significant, I bet there will be other changes in 8.2 where we will want
to change the database for a significant benefit, like reducing the
tuple header by 4 bytes by recompressing the four xid/cid fields
This fixes pg_dump so that when using the '-O' no owners option it does
not print the owner name in the object comment.
eg:
--
-- Name: actor; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: chriskl; Tablespace:
--
Becomes:
--
-- Name: actor; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: -; Tablespace:
--
This ma