On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 09:23:55PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> > And what I'm saying is that you can only do that if all single byte
> > encodings are ASCII compatable and I'm not prepared to say that...
>
> psql already assumes that; see the flex processor.
Hmm, Ok
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> ... There is a fair
> bit of encoding code in there already but the information you need here
> is specifically: is this char a control character and in particular, is
> it a newline.
The appropriate test for that is just "ch == '\n'", in all the encodings
we supp
Hello
small patch, add form is not distinct from expression (sql2003)
regards
Pavel Stehule
_
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
http://messenger.msn.cz/
diff -c -r pgsql.old/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml pg
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 09:58:21AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> > ... There is a fair
> > bit of encoding code in there already but the information you need here
> > is specifically: is this char a control character and in particular, is
> > it a newline.
>
> The appr
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> Would people prefer a patch that brought the libpq routines up to
> scratch and have mbprint use that?
I would.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmast
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:08:45AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> > Would people prefer a patch that brought the libpq routines up to
> > scratch and have mbprint use that?
>
> I would.
ACK. Will look into it.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout http://svana.org/kleptog/
>
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:07:15AM +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD wrote:
> > PS: I'd prefer if readline was only linked where it is needed, namely in
> > psql.
>
> The problem as stated is that people don't want to maintain lists o
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 07:50:48PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > Nice analysis, but we can't hack configure like that. It has to be able
> > to be fully generated from its sources. I think the other source file
> > you would need to look at is config/programs.m4. (No
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Why don't we have a libedit configure flag?
Well, I can code up a configure flag, but that doesn't mean that the
thing will compile at the end. :)
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(end of broadcast)--
