[PATCHES] 7.3 contrib/ltree compile

2006-07-13 Thread Kris Jurka
A recent backpatch to 7.3's contrib/ltree got mixed up, putting code in the wrong place. This moves it to the right place which allows it to compile. Kris Jurka Index: contrib/ltree/_ltree_gist.c === RCS file:

[PATCHES] pg_regress in C

2006-07-13 Thread Magnus Hagander
Per discussion at the conference: In order to run the regression tests on Windows without msys, pg_regress needs to be reimplemnted in C. There are two reasons to want this: 1) To be able to build completely without mingw (which can be a pain to install if you're not lucky) - build pg with

Re: [PATCHES] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree

2006-07-13 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 10:49 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: This is a revised patch originated by Junji TERAMOTO for HEAD. [BTree vacuum before page splitting] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00301.php I think we can resurrect his idea because we will scan btree

[PATCHES] Update to external_projects.sgml

2006-07-13 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Added stronger language for PgFoundry. Kept, but deprecated Gborg. Updated some api links Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since

Re: [PATCHES] Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to -

2006-07-13 Thread Zdenek Kotala
There is last version of patch with following changes/improvements: 1) I divide set_config_option to more smaller functions without backside effect. 2) Behavior of reconfiguration is same in SIG_HUP context (exclude elevel). All errors are reported and full validity of file is checked too.

Re: [PATCHES] 7.3 contrib/ltree compile

2006-07-13 Thread Neil Conway
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 09:32 -0500, Kris Jurka wrote: A recent backpatch to 7.3's contrib/ltree got mixed up, putting code in the wrong place. This moves it to the right place which allows it to compile. Applied, thanks. -Neil ---(end of

[PATCHES] maintenance diff

2006-07-13 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Hello, Updated to have stronger wording for vacuuming. Cleaned out some extra superlatives. Added a couple of index entries for Routine Maintenance and added entry specific to Analyze. -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 ||

[PATCHES] include compile problems

2006-07-13 Thread Kris Jurka
The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all system headers rule and I'm still not sure what changed that broke everything, but if people need to get work done this may help. Kris JurkaIndex:

Re: [PATCHES] include compile problems

2006-07-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Kris Jurka wrote: The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all system headers rule and I'm

Re: [PATCHES] include compile problems

2006-07-13 Thread Tom Lane
Kris Jurka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all system headers rule and I'm still not sure what changed that broke everything, but if people need to get work done

Re: [PATCHES] include compile problems

2006-07-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Kris Jurka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The attached patch makes the tree build for me again after the recent include changes. This patch still violates the postgres.h before all system headers rule and I'm still not sure what changed that broke everything, but if people

Re: [PATCHES] include compile problems

2006-07-13 Thread Kris Jurka
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote: I think that Bruce thought that math.h defines INT_MAX and related symbols, whereas the spec is perfectly clear that they're in limits.h. However, that's where they are on my machines, and yet CVS tip is not failing for me. I'm not clear why not... What