Re: [PATCHES] pgstattuple extension for indexes

2006-08-12 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a patch to add pgstatindex functions to the pgstattuple module, > which can work with 8.1.4. Please review and try it. Thanks. Huh, I bet it works with 8.1.4, but it doesn't work on CVS HEAD: /pgsql/source/00orig/contrib/pgstattuple/pgstatindex.c: In

Re: [PATCHES] pgstattuple extension for indexes

2006-08-12 Thread Satoshi Nagayasu
Alvaro, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Huh, I bet it works with 8.1.4, but it doesn't work on CVS HEAD: > > /pgsql/source/00orig/contrib/pgstattuple/pgstatindex.c: In function > 'GetBTPageStatistics': > /pgsql/source/00orig/contrib/pgstattuple/pgstatindex.c:182: error: 'BTItem' > undeclared (first use

[PATCHES] ECPG regress tests fix for VPATH builds

2006-08-12 Thread Alvaro Herrera
This patch allows ECPG to build on a VPATH build. I didn't commit it just because I don't have a non-VPATH build to make sure it still works ... -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. Index: test/compat_informi

Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived

2006-08-12 Thread Hannu Krosing
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2006-08-12 kell 10:59, kirjutas Tom Lane: > Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-08-09 kell 10:57, kirjutas Tom Lane: > >> Insert points to the next byte to be written within the internal WAL > >> buffers. The byte(s) preceding it haven't n

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] New variable server_version_num

2006-08-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
David Fetter wrote: > On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:14:16PM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > Today on IRC David Fetter and some others were discussing version > > numbers and we realized that although libpq now provides the version > > of Postgres as a number, this is still a wheel that is being

Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived

2006-08-12 Thread Hannu Krosing
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-08-09 kell 10:57, kirjutas Tom Lane: > Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-08-09 kell 12:56, kirjutas Simon Riggs: > >> Methinks it should be the Write pointer all of the time, since I can't > >> think of a valid reason for wanting to

Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived

2006-08-12 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-08-09 kell 10:57, kirjutas Tom Lane: >> Insert points to the next byte to be written within the internal WAL >> buffers. The byte(s) preceding it haven't necessarily gotten out of >> those buffers yet. Write points to the en