> Ah...I am sorry in spam mail.:-(
> It is this surely..
>
> Sorry..all
This patch looks like it has some weird combination of unix and windows
line endings. Was that intentional?
//Magnus
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/readin
Hi Magnus.
From: "Magnus Hagander"
This patch looks like it has some weird combination of unix and windows
line endings. Was that intentional?
Ea? No, did I miss something?
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/re
> > This patch looks like it has some weird combination of unix and
> > windows line endings. Was that intentional?
>
> Ea? No, did I miss something?
When I open the patch, the first part of it has windows line endings and
the second part has unix line endings.
//Magnus
---
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 12:01 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > Likely to be completed by end of next week now, submitted in chunks:
> >
> > 1. Notes on restartable recovery
Included here
> > 2. Notes on standby functionality
> > 3. discussion on rolling your own record-lev
"Albe Laurenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did not only add them to the Makefile for interfaces/libpq,
> but also everywhere something is linked against libpq in case
> somebody links static.
I intensely dislike that part of the patch, but will work on applying
the rest.
If we do need to star
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:20:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Albe Laurenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I did not only add them to the Makefile for interfaces/libpq,
> > but also everywhere something is linked against libpq in case
> > somebody links static.
> If we do need to start mentioning
"Albe Laurenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a new patch that replaces the previous one; it adds two
> macros LDAP_LIBS_FE and LDAP_LIBS_BE for frontend and backend,
> respectively.
> I did not only add them to the Makefile for interfaces/libpq,
> but also everywhere something is linked ag
