Our WAL backup documentation says in some parts of it:
..."%p is replaced by the absolute path of the file to archive..." [1]
I think this is (at least for 8.1 and upcoming 8.2 releases) wrong, since
the archiver
replaces this with pg_xlog/ only, so that the archive command
is invoked with the
Bernd Helmle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Our WAL backup documentation says in some parts of it:
> ..."%p is replaced by the absolute path of the file to archive..." [1]
> I think this is (at least for 8.1 and upcoming 8.2 releases) wrong, since
> the archiver replaces this with pg_xlog/ only,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:25:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually complained about
> it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd". I'm inclined to go
> with Bernd's suggestion to change the docs to match the code, but does
> anyone have a contr
Tom Lane wrote:
Bernd Helmle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually complained about
it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd". I'm inclined to go
with Bernd's suggestion to change the docs to match the code, but does
anyone have a contrary opi
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 17:34 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:25:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually complained about
> > it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd". I'm inclined to go
> > with Bernd's sugges
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 17:34 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:25:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually complained
>> about
>> > it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd". I'm inclined to
> > > Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually
> complained
> > > about it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd". I'm
> > > inclined to go with Bernd's suggestion to change the docs
> to match
> > > the code, but does anyone have a contrary opinion?
>
> > In Unix you c
