Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
On these questions, we have to find out how Oracle handles it, but
your approach seems appropriate.
I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
errors for invalid pattern combinations.
What do we do with other invalid
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
errors for invalid pattern combinations.
What do we do with other invalid pattern combinations in to_char() now?
Mostly, we return bogus results :-(. The
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
errors for invalid pattern combinations.
What do we do with other invalid pattern combinations in to_char() now?
Mostly, we return
On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
errors for invalid pattern combinations.
What do we do with other invalid pattern
Brendan Jurd wrote:
On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
errors for invalid pattern combinations.
What do we do
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Brendan Jurd wrote:
On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
errors for invalid pattern
On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Brendan Jurd wrote:
On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally
Brendan Jurd wrote:
On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Brendan Jurd wrote:
On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I don't think Oracle
Never mind, I found the answer:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-08/msg01931.php
Working on the patch now.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Victor B. Wagner wrote:
This patch adds following
What was the status of this? Was there anything else I needed to do with
this patch, or is it ready to be applied? Let me know if there is
anything else I need to do on this...
--
What this country needs is a good five cent nickel.
---(end of
[resending, with the patch gzipped, as the previous one seems to be lost
-- I mistakenly sent it to -hackers instead of -patches]
Hi,
Here's the autovacuum launcher patch I'm considering for inclusion.
Possibly controversial stuff:
1. I changed InitPostgres to be able to get a database by OID.
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's the autovacuum launcher patch I'm considering for inclusion.
This part is very seriously broken:
diff -c -p -r1.33 lwlock.h
*** src/include/storage/lwlock.h5 Jan 2007 22:19:58 - 1.33
--- src/include/storage/lwlock.h13 Feb
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:49 -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
What was the status of this? Was there anything else I needed to do with
this patch, or is it ready to be applied? Let me know if there is
anything else I need to do on this...
Will do -- I'm planning to apply this as soon as I have the
13 matches
Mail list logo
