Hi,
From: David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 11:47:37 -0700
> I tried a bunch of different queries, and so far, only these two
> haven't worked. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong here?
>
> WITH RECURSIVE t(n) AS (
> SELECT 1
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:21:01AM +0900, Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From: David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1
> Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 11:47:37 -0700
>
> > I tried a bunch of different queries, and so far, only these two
> > haven't worked.
Hi,
From: David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 11:26:30 -0700
> Where is the new patch?
I will create the revised patch on June.
This is a patch for this problem.
*** ../../pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeRecursivescan.c
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 05:01:11AM +0900, Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From: David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 11:26:30 -0700
>
> > Where is the new patch?
>
> I will create the revised patch on June. This is a patch
Hi all,
These patch implements the TODO item: Have psql show current values
for a sequence.
Comments are welcome.
* Credits
The original patch were developed by Euler Taveira de Oliveira
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
but how he is a little busy, he sends it to me and I made some changes
to satisfy
the TOD
"Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This seems to be against an older version of psql ... with the
> printTable API stuff, we reworked this -- in particular the mbvalidate()
> call that's only on WIN32 is gone (actually it's the lack of it that's
> gone.)
Sorry. Here's a patch against
Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This seems to be against an older version of psql ... with the
> > printTable API stuff, we reworked this -- in particular the mbvalidate()
> > call that's only on WIN32 is gone (actually it's the lack of it that's
> > gone.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The idea of this patch is to avoid the need to make explicit grants on
> sequences owned by tables.
>
I've noted that the patch i attached is an older version that doesn't
compile because of a typo...
Re-attaching
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please add the patch to the commitfest page,
>
Ah! I forgot we have a new process now... patch added to the commitfest page...
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Guayaquil - Ecuador
C
Jaime Casanova escribió:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The idea of this patch is to avoid the need to make explicit grants on
> > sequences owned by tables.
> >
>
> I've noted that the patch i attached is an older version that doesn't
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:27:16AM -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> These patch implements the TODO item: Have psql show current values
> for a sequence.
> Comments are welcome.
>
> Sequence "public.foo_bar_seq"
> +---+-+-+
> |Col
11 matches
Mail list logo
