Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Pavan Deolasee napsal(a):
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, there's a itemsz = MAXALIGN(itemsz) call before the check against
HashMaxItemSize.
Ah, right. Still should we just not MAXALIGN_DOWN the Max size to
reflect the p
Heikki Linnakangas napsal(a):
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Pavan Deolasee napsal(a):
There's another academical discrepancy between these two hunks:
I admit I don't understand what that bitmap is, it looks like we're
assuming it can take up all the space between page header and the
special port
Florian,
I'd be *very* interested in how they come to that assessment. I'd have
thought that the only alternative to getpeereid/getupeercred is
password-based or certificate-based authenticated - which seem *less*
secure because a) they also rely on the client having the correct uid
or gid (to r
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 14:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd still like to take a look.
I was tasked with reviewing this for the current commit fest, although
so far I've just been working on grokking the rest of the GIN code. But
if you'd like to review it instead, that's fine with me.
-Neil
--
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:01:05PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > > Here is the patches he made against CVS HEAD (as of today).
> >
> > The git repository should now match this :)
> >
> > http://git.postgres
Neil,
> I was tasked with reviewing this for the current commit fest, although
> so far I've just been working on grokking the rest of the GIN code. But
> if you'd like to review it instead, that's fine with me.
I have plenty of other stuff I could assign you if you're not needed on
GIN.
--
--
* David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080709 14:45]:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > In fact, I fail to see the point of you providing the repo if the
> > upstream guys are apparently not using it ...
>
> It's *very* early days to be dismissing git entirely.
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:43:27PM -0400, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> * David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080709 14:45]:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > > In fact, I fail to see the point of you providing the repo if
> > > the upstream guys are apparently not
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Simon Riggs wrote:
No action on this seen since last commitfest, but I think we should do
something with it, rather than just ignore it.
Just no action worth reporting yet. Over the weekend I finally reached
the point where I've got a system that should be capable of inde
