I have applied the following patch to improve the formating of
postgresql.conf.sample.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your
Here is a patch that adds a Rendezvous GUC variable to set the
Rendezvous name. Chris, would you please test this and let me know how
it works.
I know we are past cutoff, but I want to get Rendezvous completely
functional. I didn't bother with conditionally including it in
postgresql.conf
trivial or not the patch was broken. *sigh*. it's been a long day.
This patch will work.
sorry
andrew
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c,v
retrieving revision 1.335
diff -c -w -r1.335 pg_dump.c
*** pg_dump.c 25 Jun 2003 04:08:19 - 1.335
--- pg_dump.c
I've attached a chump little utility called pg_ping(1) and the
necessary update to pg_ctl(1) to see if a database is up and running
or not. There are three things that I haven't completed with this
that I'll try and get to the next time I have a small chunk of time
available:
1) I'd hoped to add
I was dealing with SCO on PG issues, and they supplied the following patch
against 7.3.3 for SCO OSR5.
Can it be massaged for 7.4?
LER
Forwarded Message
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 13:09:40 -0700
From: Kean Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL
I can not find any patch from that date with your name on it, and I
can't find a patch at all with connectby from you.
Of course, please repost it if you have it (archives are down), but then
again, where has the patch gone? Why isn't it in my mailbox?
I'm going to resend the patches that I have outstanding since it appears
some may have been lost. Here's the first.
==
Tom Lane wrote:
You can alias $0, similar to the argument variables. And, I confirmed
that you cannot change the value, similar to the
I'm going to resend the patches that I have outstanding since it appears
some may have been lost. Here's the second of three.
Nabil Sayegh wrote:
Am Son, 2003-06-22 um 02.09 schrieb Joe Conway:
Sounds like all that's needed for your case. But
I'm going to resend the patches that I have outstanding since it appears
some may have been lost. Here's the third of three.
===
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ISTM that source is worth knowing.
Hm, possibly. Any other
