Re: [PATCHES] patch for compile warning on date.c

2003-07-23 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just noticed a new compile warning on date.c. Attached patch fixes it. Wups, I shoulda looked closer at that code I was forward-porting from 7.2. Thanks for the timely (ahem) correction! regards, tom lane ---

[PATCHES] patch for compile warning on date.c

2003-07-23 Thread Joe Conway
I just noticed a new compile warning on date.c. Attached patch fixes it. Joe Index: src/backend/utils/adt/date.c === RCS file: /opt/src/cvs/pgsql-server/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c,v retrieving revision 1.85 diff -c -r1.85 date.c ***

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] PATCH: Memory leaks on start-up

2003-07-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Lee Kindness wrote: Content-Description:

Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing

2003-07-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Sorry, patch removed from patch queue. I will rework the patch to skip views completely, OK? --- Kenji Sugita wrote: > This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name > listing. > Index: oid2name.

Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing

2003-07-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Kenji Sugita wrote: > This small patch el

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] clock_timestamp() and transcation_timestamp() patch

2003-07-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
This looks really good, but we are in feature freeze right now. This has been saved for the 7.5 release: http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2 --- Wang Mike wrote: > diff -u -r ../postgresql-snapshot/src/

Re: [PATCHES] Czech NLS

2003-07-23 Thread Tom Lane
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks. What time will "freeze" backend messages? I think after beta > release. I'm hoping to have the bulk of the backend message changes done by the time we go beta (now scheduled for Monday). So you should be able to start on translation work after tha

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]

2003-07-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:20:34 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: Why do this at all? Security. Having shared libraries without full SONAME's is a big security risk. There have been any number of huge explots based around this. Point me at any Sola

Re: [PATCHES] PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]

2003-07-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Larry Rosenman writes: > Why do this at all? Security. Having shared libraries without full SONAME's > is a big security risk. There have been any number of huge explots based > around this. Point me at any Solaris machine <= 2.7, or any OSR5 system < > 507 or any FreeBSD system <= 4.0 and I can g

Re: [PATCHES] Czech NLS

2003-07-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Karel Zak writes: > the patch contains complete messages transaltion of: Installed. Nice work. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgres

Re: [PATCHES] Czech NLS

2003-07-23 Thread Karel Zak
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:48:19AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Karel Zak writes: > > > the patch contains complete messages transaltion of: > > Installed. Nice work. Thanks. What time will "freeze" backend messages? I think after beta release. Karel -- Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECT