On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
This has been saved for the 7.5 release:
http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
Are you sure Bruce? I'd say this is bug fixing.
Although it doesn't fix the underlying cause of the fault it does cover the
specific fault generated and
Bruce Momjian writes:
Tom, I understand your research on the historical usage of null, but in
PostgreSQL we have not two but three possible uses for n-u-l-l:
o null pointer
o null byte
o null SQL value
With that list, anything that makes null clearer is great. I think
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
This has been saved for the 7.5 release:
http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
Are you sure Bruce? I'd say this is bug fixing.
Although it doesn't fix the underlying cause of the fault it does cover
Hi,
This patch finishes off the work that I did with making view
definitions use pretty printing.
It does:
* Pretty check constraints
* Pretty index predicates
* Pretty rule definitions
* Uppercases PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE to be consistent with CHECK and
FOREIGN KEY
* View rules are improved to
