Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5

2004-02-06 Thread Magnus Hagander
>>> Taking into account Claudios comments on the previous patch, >>as well as >>> some more fooling around here of my own, here's a fourth >(and final?) >>> one. > >Actually, please hold just a second :-) > >I have an updated version of this patch that fixes the remaining small >issue (FATAL on f

Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4

2004-02-06 Thread Magnus Hagander
>> Taking into account Claudios comments on the previous patch, >as well as >> some more fooling around here of my own, here's a fourth (and final?) >> one. Actually, please hold just a second :-) I have an updated version of this patch that fixes the remaining small issue (FATAL on failure to s

Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4

2004-02-06 Thread Neil Conway
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Taking into account Claudios comments on the previous patch, as well as > some more fooling around here of my own, here's a fourth (and final?) > one. I'll apply this tonight barring any objections. -Neil ---(end of broadca