Re: [PATCHES] guc variables flags explicitly initialisation

2004-04-18 Thread Tom Lane
Fabien COELHO [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: please find attached a large but simple patch that insures that all guc variables flags are explicitly set, instead of relying on the default behavior of static variable area to be filled with zeros. This seems entirely pointless. Why should we add a

Re: [PATCHES] Basic subtransaction facility

2004-04-18 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you want. When not #defined, the behavior is the same as the current code, so it shouldn't affect anything. However I posted mainly so people could comment on the modifications, and maybe Heikki Linnakangas could see how it affects his two phase

[PATCHES] contrib/dbmirror

2004-04-18 Thread ssinger
Attached is are a few small fixes for dbmirror. 1. Fixed bug where sequences were being mirrored incorrectly if they exceeded 127 2. Fixed a bug in the perl script with mirroring sequences(John Burtenshaw sent an email to patches describing the bug in March but I htink he forgot to attach his

Re: [PATCHES] guc variables flags explicitly initialisation

2004-04-18 Thread Fabien COELHO
Dear Tom, please find attached a large but simple patch that insures that all guc variables flags are explicitly set, instead of relying on the default behavior of static variable area to be filled with zeros. This seems entirely pointless. Why should we add a large amount of noise to