Magnus Hagander wrote:
There is special code in the send_message_to_server_log
function to make
sure it's written directly to the file.
If the logger is complaining, it's quite possibly because it's
unable to
write to its file. Now that you mention it, doesn't this code go into
infinite
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
I think the only real effect of this patch will be to confuse people
who are reading the source code. tqual.c is already complicated and
fragile enough --- it doesn't need conditionally compiled features
that we can't even explain the use of.
I need a note
Tom Lane wrote:
Comments? I personally think that this is too large a patch to risk
committing into the 8.0 branch, but I suppose it depends on your
level of concern about the XID wrap hazard. (The patch does appear
to apply cleanly to the 8.0 branch, but I've not tested it there.)
I'd
Tom Lane wrote:
format of the pg_pwd and pg_group flat files: group membership has
to be recorded in terms of user sysids not user names, so that we
can avoid doing SysCache lookups in write_group_file. That's a
This also expands the problems of reusing user ids for deleted users,
but I agree
David Fetter wrote:
Please find enclosed a patch, per Dennis BjC3B6rklund, that uses -f for
input files rather than . This makes error messages, c. more
expressive.
Uh, how is it more expressive? The only difference I see is the line
numbers. Is that it?
--
Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:18:31PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
Please find enclosed a patch, per Dennis BjC3B6rklund, that
uses -f for input files rather than . This makes error messages,
c. more expressive.
Uh, how is it more expressive? The only difference I
There is special code in the send_message_to_server_log
function to make
sure it's written directly to the file.
If the logger is complaining, it's quite possibly because it's
unable to
write to its file. Now that you mention it, doesn't this
code go into
infinite recursion if
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 13:08 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:43:11 -0500,
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us wrote:
We regularly have people on IRC who delete data and then want to recover
it.
That is (one of) the purpose(s) of
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Bruce Momjian said:
Shame we had to duplicate CopyReadLine() in a sense.
If you can find a clean way to merge them please do - I'll be very grateful.
My head started to spin when I tried. In general I dislike having more than
2 or 2 levels of logic in a given piece
Wow, that is significantly different. Thanks.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
10 matches
Mail list logo
