Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Here's an updated version of the README I posted earlier. It now
reflects the changes to how pruning works.
I have taken this, and Pavan's documentation about CREATE INDEX, and
worked up an updated README. Comments?
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Pavan Deolasee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please see the version 14 of HOT patch attached.
I expected to find either a large new README, or some pretty substantial
additions to existing README files, to document how this all
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have taken this, and Pavan's documentation about CREATE INDEX, and
worked up an updated README. Comments? Corrections?
Oh, you I think the CREATE INDEX documentation you refer to was actually the
one I suggested.
A few tweaks:
(If we find any
Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 8/31/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a patch (minus catalog bump) which I think does that.
Looks sane in a very quick once-over, but I didn't test it.
works fine (here was my test). thanks
Hi
Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
(I seems I still can't get attachments through to this list)
Most changes are just small fixes and tweaks. Those are
.) Introduced %v for log_line_prefix
.) I missed a
On 9/4/07, Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
(I seems I still can't get attachments through to this list)
I haven't been able to follow the discussions here,
Pavan Deolasee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 9/4/07, Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
(I seems I still can't get attachments through to this list)
I haven't been
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
On 9/4/07, Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
(I seems I still can't get attachments through to this list)
I haven't been able to follow
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
It would be worth mentioning that columns appearing in predicates
of partial indexes and expressions of expression indexes are also
checked. If any of these columns are changed, HOT update is not done.
Added now:
Tuples are checked against expression and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Florian G. Pflug) writes:
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
On 9/4/07, Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
(I seems I still can't get attachments through
Chris Browne wrote:
Similarly, does it seem likely that Slony-I users would need to worry
about this?
No.. it should have zero negative effects for Slony-I. In fact, it will
be an advantage in some cases I think. I remember something about
troubles with Slony-I if the in-use xids on a
Pavan Deolasee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be worth mentioning that columns appearing in predicates
of partial indexes and expressions of expression indexes are also
checked. If any of these columns are changed, HOT update is not done.
In discussion a question arose. I don't think we
Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is an updated patch, following the discussion.
The patch can be found at: http://soc.phlo.org/lazyxidassign.v4.patch
I've been working through this, and found a couple items that seem like
judgment calls:
* Is there a good reason for formatting
13 matches
Mail list logo
