Tom Raney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This revised version of our patch uses the function estimate_rel_size()
from plancat.c to estimate the number of tuples in the parent relation.
This method is an alternative to scanning the parent relation to
estimate the number of tuples, as we did in
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One side effect of this change is that the call to SendPostmasterSignal
now occurs after the lock has been released. ISTM this is a good idea
on general principles (no syscalls in lwlocked code), but I'm wondering
if I created a thundering hoard
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yep, patch attached. I also changed xactGetCommittedChildren to return
the original array instead of copying it, as Alvaro suggested.
Applied with minor corrections (mostly comment fixes, but there were
a couple of real mistakes).
This has been applied by Tom.
---
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Elsewhere in our codebase where we use arrays that are enlarged as
needed, we keep track of
Kenneth Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear PostgreSQL Developers,
This patch is a diff -c against the hashfunc.c from postgresql-8.3beta1.
It's pretty obvious that this patch hasn't even been tested on a
big-endian machine:
+ #ifndef WORS_BIGENDIAN
However, why do we need two code paths
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then try using %lu and no casts. That should get rid of the warnings the
proper way.
Ok, I rewrote it to use %lu for format strings.
Jeremy Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sizeof(DWORD) is always 4, even on 64-bit windows. sizeof(long) is also
[4/4] - sepostgresql-policy-8.4devel-3.patch
This patch gives us the default security policy for SE-PostgreSQL.
You can build it as a security policy module. It can be linked with
the existing distributor's policy, and reloaded.
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei [EMAIL
It seems to me some of SE-PostgreSQL patches are not delivered yet,
although [3/4] and [4/4] were already done.
Does anti-spam system caught my previous three messages?
If necessary, I will send them again.
Thanks,
Kohei KaiGai wrote:
The series of patches are the proposal of Security-Enhanced
The series of patches are the proposal of Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL
(SE-PostgreSQL) for the upstreamed PostgreSQL 8.4 development cycle.
[1/4] sepostgresql-pgace-8.4devel-3.patch
provides PGACE (PostgreSQL Access Control Extension) framework
[2/4]