Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] 8.2 features?

2006-07-18 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
The major downside is that somewhere between 9000 and 1 VALUES-targetlists produces ERROR: stack depth limit exceeded. Perhaps for the typical use-case this is sufficient though. I'm open to better ideas, comments, objections... If the use case is people running MySQL dumps, then there

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] 8.2 features?

2006-07-18 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I did some experimentation just now, and could not get mysql to accept a command longer than about 1 million bytes. It complains about Got a packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes which seems a bit odd because max_allowed_packet is allegedly set to 16 million, but anyway I don't think

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] 8.2 features?

2006-07-18 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I did some experimentation just now, and could not get mysql to accept a command longer than about 1 million bytes. It complains about Got a packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes which seems a bit odd because max_allowed_packet is allegedly set to 16 million, but anyway I don't think

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] PQescapeIdentifier

2006-07-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hang on a second. Has someone considered the encoding issues this might suffer from, same as PQescapeString? I remember we discussed it briefly and I mentioned it's outta my league to prove one way or the other... Bruce Momjian wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: TODO item done for 8.2

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Magic block for modules

2006-06-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Marko's suggestion on producing a list of installed modules comes to mind, and I suspect tools like pgadmin or ppa will want to be able to show this information. My request for phpPgAdmin is to somehow be able to check if the .so file for a module is present. For instance, I'd like to

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Magic block for modules

2006-06-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
For instance, I'd like to 'enable slony support' if the slony shared library is present. PPA's slony support automatically executes the .sql files, so all I need to know is if the .so is there. I really think this is backwards: you should be looking for the .sql files. Every module will have

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for error locations

2006-03-13 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
from all libpq-using applications not just psql. We could make this conditional on the error verbosity --- in terse mode the LINE N output wouldn't appear, and at character N still would. Applications should already be expecting multiline outputs from PQerrorMessage if they're in non-terse

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] pg_freespacemap question

2006-03-12 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
The point here is that if tuples require 50 bytes, and there are 20 bytes free on a page, pgstattuple counts 20 free bytes while FSM ignores the page. Recording that space in the FSM will not improve matters, it'll just risk pushing out FSM records for pages that do have useful amounts of free

Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists remainder

2006-02-06 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Here's a first draft patch for DROP ... IF EXISTS for the remaining cases, namely: LANGUAGE, TABLESPACE, TRIGGER OPERATOR CLASS, FUNCTION, AGGREGATE, OPERATOR, CAST and RULE. At what point does this stop being useful and become mere bloat? The only case I can ever recall being actually

Re: [PATCHES] patch to create system view that lists cursors

2006-01-12 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I think it is worth distinguishing more clearly between portals that should be displayed to the user and those that should not (which might be labelled internal cursors, perhaps). The tests above seem fairly ad-hoc. With all this system view love going on, is there any point having a

Re: [PATCHES] Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET

2005-12-22 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Agreed. I have gotten confused on how to set $user in the past. I have developed the following patch that sets the default with the double quotes around it, and it works fine. The patch also contains updated documentation. Just be careful about pg_dump's special handling of search_path in

Re: [PATCHES] PLpgSQL: list of scalars as row for assign stmt, fore

2005-12-20 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
x, y := r; That strikes me as a really bad idea. It weakens both syntax and semantic error checking, to accomplish how much? Could use PHP-style thingy: LIST(x, y) := r; Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the

Re: [PATCHES] PLpgSQL: list of scalars as row for assign stmt, fore

2005-12-20 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Pavel Stehule wrote: x, y := r; That strikes me as a really bad idea. It weakens both syntax and semantic error checking, to accomplish how much? Could use PHP-style thingy: LIST(x, y) := r; Chris It's inconsystency :-(. EXECUTE INTO and SELECT INTO use scalar of vectors

Re: [PATCHES] In pg_dump no owner mode don't dump owner names in

2005-11-21 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
This fixes pg_dump so that when using the '-O' no owners option it does not print the owner name in the object comment. Why is that a good idea? At the moment I want to dump sample databases for a project. I don't want my name or username appearing anywhere in them. I dump without owners

[PATCHES] In pg_dump no owner mode don't dump owner names in comments

2005-11-20 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
This fixes pg_dump so that when using the '-O' no owners option it does not print the owner name in the object comment. eg: -- -- Name: actor; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: chriskl; Tablespace: -- Becomes: -- -- Name: actor; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: -; Tablespace: -- This

Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists

2005-11-17 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
If the consensus is to add this to all of them, then I propose to apply the patch I have (with a slight fix for an oversight in the case of domains, plus docs and tests) for the 8 cases and start working on the remaining 13 as time permits. To be honest, I have not even looked at those 13

Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists

2005-11-16 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Will we get this functionality for ALL objects? Bruce Momjian wrote: Removed from queue. Andrew is committing it. --- Andrew Dunstan wrote: OK, now it looks like this: andrew=# drop table blurflx; ERROR: table

Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists

2005-11-16 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I think anything else will have to be done individually, although the pattern can be copied. Perhaps we should take bids on what should/should not be covered. Everything should be covered, otherwise it's just annoying for users... Chris ---(end of

Re: [PATCHES] TODO Item - Add system view to show free space map

2005-10-27 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Want to host it on pgfoundry until 8.2 is released? Mark Kirkwood wrote: This patch implements a view to display the free space map contents - e.g : regression=# SELECT c.relname, m.relblocknumber, m.blockfreebytes FROM pg_freespacemap m INNER JOIN pg_class c

[PATCHES] Error in ORDER BY on check constraints in psql

2005-10-19 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Everything is sorted by object name in \d table except check constraints for some reason. It seems it's ordering by the wrong column. Seems like a bug to me. Attached is the trivial patch. Chris Index: src/bin/psql/describe.c

Re: [PATCHES] Error in ORDER BY on check constraints in psql

2005-10-19 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
That was probably done deliberately, back in the day when constraints tended to have uselessly random names like $1 --- sorting by the constraint text was more helpful. I agree that now sorting by name seems like the better thing. Even in the $x case, it's better to have them sorted in that

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends

2005-07-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
We have to consider what happens at stat reset -- AFAICS there's no problem, because as soon as the table sees some activity, it will be picked up by pgstat. However, it would be bad if stats are reset right after some heavy activity on a table. Maybe the only thing we need is

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-04 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
You are into the cycle we were in. We discussed pg_object size (too vague) and pg_index_size (needs pg_toast_size too, and maybe toast indexes; too many functions). Yeah, I read those discussions, and think you were better off then than you are now, which is why I went back to it somewhat.

Re: [PATCHES] enable/disable trigger (Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] Open items)

2005-07-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
ALTER TABLE table ENABLE TRIGGER trigname ALTER TABLE table DISABLE TRIGGER trigname Bruce said to allow them only super-user, but currently this patch allows also the table owner. The table owner can drop and create triggers - so why shouldn't they be able to enable and disable them?

Re: [PATCHES] enable/disable trigger (Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] Open items)

2005-07-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: The table owner can drop and create triggers - so why shouldn't they be able to enable and disable them? For convenience or easy operation. I believe the user doesn't like to create same triggers again and again. I said why _shouldn't_. I was agreeing with you.

[PATCHES] Dump comments on large objects in text mode

2005-06-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hi, Attached patch enables dumping of LOB comments when in text mode. I really don't get the binary/custom format LOB stuff (and don't have time to investigate), so perhaps someone else can do that. Having it in text format is still an improvement though. Chris blobcomments.txt.gz

Re: [PATCHES] Dump comments on large objects in text mode

2005-06-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Attached patch enables dumping of LOB comments when in text mode. I really don't get the binary/custom format LOB stuff (and don't have time to investigate), so perhaps someone else can do that. That's pretty icky :-(. I think the right way is more like this. Hehe - in the world of open

Re: [PATCHES] Dump comments on large objects in text mode

2005-06-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
The trick in hacking pg_dump is to understand which layer you need to modify. The whole thing seems overly complex to me :-( ... but redesigning it is a project for another release cycle. I just find the whole BLOB handling very tricky to understand :( I vote that we combine pg_dumpall and

Re: [PATCHES] Escape handling in strings

2005-06-15 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I'm still really iffy about this. I think it will really hurt pgsql due to backward compatibility :( (If I'm understanding how the proposed change works...) Chris Bruce Momjian wrote: A summary of my proposal to add a new E'' string for escape and have non-E escapes not handle backslashes

Re: [PATCHES] Escape handling in strings

2005-06-15 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Yep, you probably are. The hurt is backward compatibility, but the gain is greater portability with other database systems. It's just going to break millions of PHP scripts :( Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe

Re: [PATCHES] Escape handling in strings

2005-06-15 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
* Allow backslash handling in quoted strings to be disabled for portability The use of C-style backslashes (.e.g. \n, \r) in quoted strings is not SQL-spec compliant, so allow such handling to be disabled. However, disabling backslashes

Re: [PATCHES] indxpath.c refactoring

2005-06-11 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I don't see anyone very excited about r-tree these days; have you noticed that no one has stepped up to repair the known semantic errors? I wouldn't spend any time on it in the prover. That sort of thing is always self-fulfilling. If rtrees were fast, logged and rad, then more people would

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Implementing RESET CONNECTION ...

2005-06-04 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
What would be absolutely ideal is a reset connection command, plus some way of knowing via the protocol if it's needed or not. Chris Bruce Momjian wrote: What did we decide on RESET CONNECTION. Do we want an SQL command or something only the protocol can do?

Re: [PATCHES] patch for between symmetric, asymmetric (from TODO)

2005-06-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
The implementation in this patch has the same problems as all the previously rejected attempts: it evaluates its arguments twice. You need to make BETWEEN SYMMETRIC into a separate node type that evaluates each argument only once. And that's also been submitted. The problem then is making

Re: [PATCHES] lastval()

2005-05-10 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I like the concept, but I haven't looked at the code -- I'd be happy to review the implementation, although I won't waste my time if most people are opposed to the idea itself. It'd make implementing various PHP userland functions a real breeze... Chris ---(end of

Re: [PATCHES] Update psql and pg_dump for new COPY api

2005-05-07 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: This patch updates psql and pg_dump to use the new copy api. Probably needs some review. I have tested it with dos and unix newlines, etc. Chris Content

Re: [PATCHES] Dealing with CLUSTER failures

2005-05-07 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Seems like an idea to me... On another note, what about the problem I pointed out where it's not possible to drop the default on a serial column after you alter it to a varchar, for example... Chris On Sat, 7 May 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: I don't think that's

Re: [PATCHES] Update psql and pg_dump for new COPY api

2005-04-05 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Thinking about this - with the new PQputCopyEnd, the sending of \. can probably also be removed. Chris Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: This patch updates psql and pg_dump to use the new copy api. Probably needs some review. I have tested it with dos and unix newlines, etc

Re: [PATCHES] [WIP] shared row locks

2005-03-28 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I implemented the user-visible side of this (FKs in particular) using a new FOR SHARE clause to SELECT. This is of course open to suggestions. Inside the grammar I hacked it using the productions for FOR UPDATE, and stashed a String as the first node of the relid List. Well MySQL uses IN SHARE

[PATCHES] Update psql and pg_dump for new COPY api

2005-03-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
This patch updates psql and pg_dump to use the new copy api. Probably needs some review. I have tested it with dos and unix newlines, etc. Chris ? src/bin/initdb/.deps ? src/bin/initdb/initdb ? src/bin/ipcclean/ipcclean ? src/bin/pg_config/.deps ? src/bin/pg_config/pg_config ?

Re: [PATCHES] WIP: make EXPLAIN ANALYZE show time spent in triggers

2005-03-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
The attached patch allows EXPLAIN ANALYZE to break out the time spent in triggers when EXPLAINing a statement that can fire triggers. Formerly this time was included in Total runtime but not otherwise accounted for. Very nice. An example is regression=# explain analyze delete from foo;

Re: [PATCHES] WIP: make EXPLAIN ANALYZE show time spent in triggers

2005-03-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Could we get plain EXPLAIN output as well: Plain EXPLAIN doesn't run the query, and therefore not the triggers. But the point of it is to estimate, right? Could it not estimate the number of time each trigger would be called. Surely that's the same as estimating the number of rows each clause

Re: [PATCHES] WIP: make EXPLAIN ANALYZE show time spent in triggers

2005-03-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Right. So what's the point? It seems like the printout would just be useless noise: it'd repeat N times the estimate of the top-level number of output rows. Well I guess the point would be to remind people that there are (potentially) expensive triggers that will run, so even though the

Re: [PATCHES] WIP: make EXPLAIN ANALYZE show time spent in triggers

2005-03-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
The attached patch allows EXPLAIN ANALYZE to break out the time spent in triggers when EXPLAINing a statement that can fire triggers. Formerly this time was included in Total runtime but not otherwise accounted for. Actually, should you make it talk about RULEs as well? Chris

Re: [PATCHES] A way to let Vacuum warn if FSM settings are low.

2005-02-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I find this tiny (9-line) patch useful to help my clients know when FSM settings may need updating. Some of the more frequently asked questions here are in regards to FSM settings. One hint I've seen is to run vacuum verbose;. At the end of thousands of lines of INFO and DETAIL messages

Re: [PATCHES] Change to -f in examples with input files

2005-02-22 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Uh, how is it more expressive? The only difference I see is the line numbers. Is that it? That could be a very big deal in case of error on a large file, so yes. In IRC, I always recommend that ppl use -f, since it's so much more useful :) Chris ---(end of

Re: [PATCHES] Clarify use of NOW() in pl/pgsql docs

2005-02-10 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
This one from Ben Calvert. It uses the (imho clearer) NOW() rather than 'NOW' in a PL/PgSQL function example. Applied, thanks. Why not use CURRENT_TIMSTAMP instead of NOW() everywhere in the docs. I mean, it's standard and NOW() isn't... Chris ---(end of

Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql

2005-01-28 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I've attached a revised patch which fixes the problem, however I'm sure there is a better way. Thanks to Neil for putting up with me on irc :-) How about calling the savepoint pg_psql_savepoint instead, that way it follows our 'don't begin things with pg_' philosophy. Chris

Re: [PATCHES] Allow pooled connections to list all prepared queries

2004-12-25 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I don't see this as all that helpful for a client interface that does the preparation itself. Possibly it could be used for libpq, but you mentioned DBI which should already know what it has or has not prepared. The idea of adding a network round trip to detect a prepared statement seems like a

Re: [PATCHES] PITR Archive Recovery plus WIP PITR

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I am not fond of the timeline idea, especially for 7.5. Let's get usage cases submitted first. I can imagine timelines as causing significant confusion during restore, which is the last thing we want to do. I think that judgment is exactly backward. *Not* having timelines is what will cause

Re: [PATCHES] PITR Archive Recovery plus WIP PITR

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Please ignore- seems some old mail of mine got sent waaay late... Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: I am not fond of the timeline idea, especially for 7.5. Let's get usage cases submitted first. I can imagine timelines as causing significant confusion during restore, which is the last thing we want

[PATCHES] Improvement to pg_trgm readme

2004-11-25 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
This adds mention of my latest tweak to the tsearch2/pg_trgm integration. It is much better to create a word list of unstemmed words than stemmed ones. Chris Index: contrib/pg_trgm/README.pg_trgm === RCS file:

Re: [PATCHES] htmlhelp generation

2004-11-23 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Um ... what's an htmlhelp? It's the kind of format the Windows'ish programs use for their internal help browsers. It consists of regular HTML plus some index files. pgAdmin needs it, and maybe the Windows binary package would like it as well. I've trivially generated them from docbook xml

Re: [PATCHES] Change recycled transaction log from LOG to DEBUG1

2004-09-05 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
May as well downgrade the CLOG message as well then. Chris Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message On August 9, Tom Lane wrote regarding recycled transaction log file messages appearing in the server logs:

Re: [PATCHES] Allow psql to work against non-tablespace servers (e.g.

2004-08-17 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
One of the things I still intend to do is make psql work against all previous backends, so this patch is a good first step :) For example, we have web servers on database servers on different machines. Recompiling psql on the web servers is a PITA since it means recompiling PHP then

Re: [PATCHES] Allow psql to work against non-tablespace servers (e.g.

2004-08-17 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
If I get time, I will begin making psql backward-compatible to 7.3 and further, but the changes to do so will not be as small as this patch and I would rather they get evaluated separately. But do we want to do this? Is it worth doing, and maintaining? Yes please, I'll maintain it as well :)

Re: [PATCHES] Allow psql to work against non-tablespace servers (e.g.

2004-08-17 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
At least we are guaranteed to compile against current libraries - apps outside the source tree never get that luxury and have worse compatibility problems. :) The issue is that no one has been asking for this functionality, and I can imagine it becoming quite a mess after a few releases. No

Re: [PATCHES] That dump-comments-on-composite-type-columns patch...

2004-08-07 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
$ pg_dump regression zzz.out pg_dump: SQL command failed pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: complex is a composite type pg_dump: The command was: COPY public.complex (r, i) TO stdout; $ That could be fixed by just checking the relkind when dumping table data, but hey. I suspect it had

Re: [PATCHES] psql latex bugfixes

2004-08-06 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
OK, it looks good. I don't have latex handy to build it, but it looks fine to me... Chris Bruce Momjian wrote: If you would like to review it I will apply it. --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: Surely this is a really good

Re: [PATCHES] More fixes for pg_dump

2004-08-04 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Applied. I notice though that the line numbers don't seem to match CVS tip, which suggests that you've got some patches still unapplied? If so, Bruce seems to have missed adding them to the patch queue. Hmmm, no... Not sure what happened there. The diff in the committers email seemed fine

Re: [PATCHES] Troff -ms output for psql

2004-08-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
You mean 8.1 release :P Bruce Momjian wrote: This has been saved for the 7.6 release: http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister

Re: [PATCHES] psql latex bugfixes

2004-08-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Surely this is a really good bug fix and should be in 7.5? Bruce Momjian wrote: This has been saved for the 7.6 release: http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2 --- Roger Leigh wrote: I have noticed that the

Re: [PATCHES] fix schema ownership on first connection preliminary

2004-08-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I'm also wondering about what side-effects this will have on pg_dump behavior. In particular, will pg_dump try to ALTER OWNER public, and if so will that be appropriate? We haven't previously needed to assume that we are restoring into a database with the same datowner as we dumped from... In my

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for OWNER TO breaking ACLs

2004-08-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
* You had consistently changed the simple_heap_update calls to do the wrong thing. (I'm surprised it didn't blow up on you in your testing.) In a sequence like newtuple = heap_modifytuple(tup, rel, repl_val, repl_null, repl_repl); simple_heap_update(rel, newtuple-t_self,

Re: [PATCHES] USING INDEX TABLESPACE

2004-08-01 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Applied. I also added some code to ruleutils.c to make pg_get_constraintdef output the USING INDEX TABLESPACE clause at need. We might want to think about getting pg_dump to rely more on pg_get_constraintdef and friends, instead of native wit ... Yes, that was really dumb of me not to think of

[PATCHES] Fix for OWNER TO breaking ACLs

2004-07-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Attached is a patch that fixes the owner change command on objects that have privileges. It probably needs a once over review since it involves a decent amount of pointer arithmetic. Note that languages don't have owners, and hence don't need fixing. The owner change acl support is as follows:

Re: [PATCHES] USING INDEX TABLESPACE

2004-07-28 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
create table test (a integer primary key index tablespace loc); create table test (a integer unique index tablespace loc); create table test (a integer); alter table test add primary key(a) index tablespace loc; create table test (a integer); alter table test add unique(a) index tablespace loc;

[PATCHES] USING INDEX TABLESPACE

2004-07-27 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
The attached patch allows the specification of the tablespace the index is to be created in for unique and pk constraints. It also fixes the dumping of such constraints so that they are restored into the correct tablespace, after they have been moved with SET TABLESPACE. This is currently an

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

2004-07-26 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
If you want to put in the function and document that it may cause problems, I won't object; it's not like we don't have other features that are poorly implemented :-(. But my vote would be to remove it. I'm down with removing it - people don't read documentation :/ Chris

[PATCHES] More fixes for pg_dump

2004-07-26 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
This patch does two things to pg_dump: * Dumps comments on columns of composite types * Instead of putting all the OWNER TO commands at the end, it dumps then after each object. This is WAY more readable and nice. ACLs are still at the end. Chris pg_dump5.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

2004-07-25 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Would you use a kill operation in the way you describe above if you knew that it had, say, a 1% chance of causing a database-wide PANIC each time you used it? The odds of a problem are probably a great deal less than 1%, especially if the backend is sitting idle. But they're not nil, and I don't

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

2004-07-25 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
The first time I used it was for precisely this reason - some buggy PHP code opened hundreds of connections to a dev server which then remained open doing nothing except wasting resources. It was particularly useful in that case as I didn't have access to the web server at the time. Shortly

Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-07-20 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Yes, the reason it would be nice for me is that currently if you want to dump two specific, related tables from your db, there's no way to do it with pg_dump within the one transactions (ie. maintaining integrity). I guess I'm in favour of -t -t but not -T depending on the complexity of it.

Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-07-20 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
No, it doesn't. I can look into that if you like. The patch was entirely to satisfy a need some of our customers have. The -T switch does fill a real need for our customers; our product has a couple of tables that aren't critical if they aren't backed up, but as the product evolves, we

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

2004-07-20 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I'm in favour of how it is now, so long as the comment is clear. It's the Unix Way :) Chris I'd vote for it as a clarity factor too. Klaus Naumann wrote: On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter archive_mode Have I missed something since it

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

2004-07-19 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Okay, we agree on that part at least; I'll take care of it. If anyone wants to argue for further copying during initdb, that can be added later. I reckon it should be copied into $PGDATA :) Otherwise, when I'm in a panic at recovery time, I'd have to figure out where the heck my package has

Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-07-19 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I see one vote in favor of its inclusion on the grounds it is a bug not to support multiple -t parameters. However, is someone objects I will have to hold it for 7.6. It needs SGML doc additions which I will do myself. Well, I guess I'm against it based on the rules of feature freeze, even

Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

2004-07-19 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Well, I guess I'm against it based on the rules of feature freeze, even though it would be really useful for me :( It would have been a lot easier to approve it if it'd arrived on June 30 rather than July 6 :-(. However, I do believe that David originally submitted a slightly-too-late

Re: [PATCHES] pg_autovacuum integration attempt #2

2004-07-17 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
The thing I was trying to do was use the GUC hook function to make sure that the required GUC variables are also set before GUC reports autovac as enabled. This seemed cleaner to me, but apparently it won't work since it seems that autovac_enabled is read from GUC before the stats variables, and

Re: [PATCHES] pg_autovacuum integration attempt #2

2004-07-17 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Can we please have it default to enabled :) We can but without also enabling statistics it will not work. Do we want to enable both by default? Weeell...it just seemed to me that we won't cut down on the support mails unless it's on by default... I mean at some point in the future, we WILL

[PATCHES] Fixes for 3 bugs in pg_dump

2004-07-14 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
This patch fixes the following bugs: * pg_dump --clean against a pre-7.3 server output drop commands in the form: DROP .foo; . These will now all be output as: DROP public.foo; * If you use ALTER USER to set user params on the cluster owner user, these would not be dumped. This patch will now

Re: [PATCHES] Fixes for 3 bugs in pg_dump

2004-07-14 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Actually, i'm not sure that making it respect -S is the right way to go. What we really need is an option that specifies the cluster owner on the new installation. I will revert that part of this patch and resubmit shortly... Chris Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: This patch fixes the following

[PATCHES] Better fixes for pg_dump bugs

2004-07-14 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
OK, This dump is a proper fix for the three bugs mentioned in the first email. It now just outputs an ALTER USER command for the cluster owner and has nothing to do with the '-S' switch. It also fixes the other two issues. Chris pg_dump_fixes2.txt.gz Description: application/gunzip

Re: [PATCHES] add missing options to pg_dumpall

2004-07-14 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hmmm, and I need to resurrect the -X use-set-session-authorization flag for pg_dumpall as well...patch coming soon... Chris Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Patch applied. Thanks. thanks - that's wonderful news :-) However the patch as it went in has a minor cosmetic issues

Re: [PATCHES] Better fixes for pg_dump bugs

2004-07-14 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hehe - actually, don't commit this either, I keep finding more and more bugs in pg_dump... Chris Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: OK, This dump is a proper fix for the three bugs mentioned in the first email. It now just outputs an ALTER USER command for the cluster owner and has nothing to do

Re: [PATCHES] Updated ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE patch

2004-07-11 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Please remove that; if I thought either one was a good idea, I would have allowed it in the committed patch. Sequences are too small to be worth moving around, and may someday be reimplemented in a fashion that doesn't use up a separate disk file for each one. If we allow SET TABLESPACE on them

Re: [PATCHES] Updated ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE patch

2004-07-11 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Does this patch allow setting the tablespace of sequences as well? If so, then you will need to modify pg_dump of SERIAL sequences. Perhaps output a ALTER TABLE/SET TABLESPACE command after the CREATE TABLE definition to move the SERIAL sequence. The same argument applies if it allows moving

Re: [PATCHES] Updated ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE patch

2004-07-11 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
In fact, now that I think of it, the patch-as-committed already introduces some serious headaches for pg_dump: it can't know for sure what name will be assigned to constraint indexes (pkey and unique indexes) so it has no good way to emit ALTER TABLE SET TABLESPACE commands for those indexes. I

Re: [PATCHES] Updated ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE patch

2004-07-11 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Otherwise, we need to extend the ADD CONSTRAINT syntax. Yeah, I was wondering if there was some minimal-impact way to do that. Oh, or we create ALTER CONSTRAINT :) Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map

Re: [PATCHES] Updated ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE patch

2004-07-11 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Otherwise, we need to extend the ADD CONSTRAINT syntax. Yeah, I was wondering if there was some minimal-impact way to do that. Shall I hold off on doing any pg_dump changes then? Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe

Re: [PATCHES] OWNER TO mega patch #2

2004-07-10 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
. --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: Hi, This is the final patch that adds OWNER TO commands to every object. This includes tablespaces. I have also added RENAME TO on tablespaces. Full docs changes are included (+ 3 new files that must be put in doc/src/sgml/ref). All new regression

Re: [PATCHES] Updated ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE patch

2004-07-08 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Attached is an updated ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE patch. It uses the block by block copy mechanism proposed by Tom and handles i) ALTER TABLE index and ii) Copying of TOAST tables and the TOAST table's index. It doesn't handle copying of system tables (pg_largeobject) and, in the

Re: [PATCHES] Digital Mars C++ - Clients

2004-07-08 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Other products, such as wxWindows, have seen quite a lot of Digital Mars users embrace it once it started supporting DMC++. That is an extremely poor allegory. wxWindows is a GUI TOOLKIT. PostgreSQL is an independent database server. 99.999% of our windows installations will be from the binary

Re: [PATCHES] First attempt: support for '\dg' in psql

2004-07-07 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I have moved the mention of the dash higher in the TODO file. Maybe you could put the dash in a different color (red?) so it stands out more. Or maybe the whole item could go in a different color if done./ Yes, what about stroke through: Because neither works in the plain text version. Chris

Re: [PATCHES] plperl support for older perl versions

2004-07-04 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hmmm, It doesn't apply cleanly for me... Chris Andrew Dunstan wrote: Would people with older versions of perl ( 5.6 I think ) please try the attached patch against what is now on cvs for plperl, and let me know if it compiles, links and runs? (Thanks to Abhijit Menon-Sen for pointing me in the

[PATCHES] pg_dump owner and acl fix #2

2004-06-28 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
OK, This version works wonderfully on my production database. Chris pg_dump_owners2.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[PATCHES] add missing options to pg_dumpall

2004-06-25 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hi, This patch adds the following options to pg_dumpall, to be passed to pg_dump: -S, --superuser=NAME -O, --no-owner -X disable-dollar-quoting, --disable-dollar-quoting -X disable-triggers, --disable-triggers Chris pg_dumpall.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump --clean w/ = 7.2 server

2004-06-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
When running pg_dump --clean against a server that doesn't have schemas the namespace is blank and ends up producing a dump full off things like: DROP TABLE .tab; Since the person is dumping using 7.5 pg_dump, presumably they will be restoring to 7.5, and it should be: DROP TABLE public.tab;

[PATCHES] OWNER TO mega patch #2

2004-06-22 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hi, This is the final patch that adds OWNER TO commands to every object. This includes tablespaces. I have also added RENAME TO on tablespaces. Full docs changes are included (+ 3 new files that must be put in doc/src/sgml/ref). All new regression tests included also. Please review and apply

[PATCHES] Show encoding in initdb messages

2004-06-21 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Does this: The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user chriskl. This user must also own the server process. The database cluster will be initialized with locale C. The database cluster will be initialized with default encoding UNICODE. creating directory

  1   2   >