Tom Lane wrote:
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Attached is a patch to implement "tinyint".
I don't think we've really solved the numeric-hierarchy casting problems
well enough to be able to stand adding another member of the hierarchy.
In particular,
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
I don't think we've really solved the numeric-hierarchy casting problems
well enough to be able to stand adding another member of the hierarchy.
In particular, what impact is this going to have on implicit typing of
integer constants?
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hmm - replying to my own post.
I did cut one corner, in that I did not implement tiny->int8 and
tiny->non integers yet. That is, however, an implementation detail
rather than a principal problem. If that is the whole problem, I'll
add those as well. I w
stem, with even more horrible results.
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
he file security.c to go in
src/backend/port/win32.
//Magnus
<> <>
---(end of broadcast)-----------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmast
