BY
HAVING
WITH CUBE;
An example along with the output is provided in the
README.datacube file. Kindly have a look. Let us know your response.
Srikanth M
Sumit Kumar Mukherjee
*** ./src/backend/executor/spi.c.orig 2003-06-30 00:48:37.0 +0530
--- ./src/backend/executor/spi.c
account even the base
query (the one WITHOUT CUBE). We have referred some sites and articles
before planning the code. Since we are building a DATACUBE all the
information is required.
Hope we have made ourselves clear.
Sumit
Srikanth
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
&g
Thanks for letting know. Could you also let me know the exact
syntax, I mean, we are not sure whether GROUP BY CUBE(...) is followed by
a HAVING clause. Kindly inform us soon so that we can make the changes and
send you the updated patch and files.
Sumit
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Tom Lane
of further modifications that may be necessary.
Srikanth M
Sumit Kumar Mukherjee
*** ./src/backend/executor/spi.c.orig 2003-06-30 00:48:37.0 +0530
--- ./src/backend/executor/spi.c2003-06-30 00:51:06.0 +0530
***
*** 1046,1051
--- 1046,1052
Can someone inform us of the developments regarding our code on
DATACUBE? We would like to know if there are somethings which we might
have overlooked. If possible, can we also know if we can expect it to be
added to this release?
Sumit
Srikanth
---(end of
-functioning in the
case of VIEWS, UNION et al.
Please send in your suggestions regarding this approach so that we
can start work on it.
Srikanth
Sumit
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http
