I discussed this hack with Neil and Josh in Ottawa back in May. I
took a stab at it a few weeks ago and below are the results. It is
mostly modeled after the existing inline_function. The approach taken
is to recursively cleanup the RTable where stable SQL functions are
found in it.
I've been
I discussed this hack with Neil and Josh in Ottawa back in May. I
took a stab at it a few weeks ago and below are the results. It is
mostly modeled after the existing inline_function. The approach taken
is to recursively cleanup the rtable.
I've been testing this in our dev environment for a
page? Assuming it's being written to as the backup is in progress. (We
are talking about when disk blocks are smaller than PG blocks here, so
can't guarantee an atomic write for a PG block?)
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---(end of broadcast
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 11:27 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
Is that always true? Could the backup not pick up a partially-written
page? Assuming it's being written to as the backup is in progress. (We
are talking about when disk blocks are smaller than PG blocks here, so
mode does need such a switch
because there is no way to check if there was an error. So just put two
queries there and hope one will work?
DROP TABLE foo;
CREATE TABLE foo...
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3
comfortable in telling them what *not* to do, but nothing more.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so
.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
in the discussion, as I am not on these lists.
I used the current CVS tree at
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/projects/cvsroot as a starting
point.
Sincerely,
--
Richard van den Berg, CISSP
Trust Factory B.V. | http://www.trust-factory.com/
Bazarstraat 44a | Phone: +31 70 3620684
NL
I notice that contrib/fuzzystrmatch/dmetaphone.c doesn't compile cleanly
as it stands - it mixes declarations in code, C++-style. The attached
patch shifts declarations to the tops of functions and enables this file
to compile cleanly as C.
Richard
Index: contrib/fuzzystrmatch/dmetaphone.c
