Who did you think would do it?
regards, tom lane
you :-)
Seriously, I didn't give it much though. This is undoubtedly the best way
although some projects handle it differently. A tech-writer perhaps, with
better writing skills then programmers in general. But people like that are
probabaly
Sure, I'll provide some docs. Just wasn't aware that patchers did that.
- thomas
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 06:12
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Some new SPI functions
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Sure, I'll provide some docs. Just wasn't aware that patchers did that.
- thomas
Yeah, in PostgreSQL, whoever writes the patch also must submit docs.
It's the best way of keeping docs up to date :)
Chris
---(end of
Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sure, I'll provide some docs. Just wasn't aware that patchers did that.
Who did you think would do it?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through
Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I need three new functions in the Server Programming Interface (SPI) when
mapping an ExecutionPlan to a Java prepared statement (Pl/Java project).
These functions look reasonable, but where is the documentation patch?
regards,
Tom Lane wrote:
Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I need three new functions in the Server Programming Interface (SPI) when
mapping an ExecutionPlan to a Java prepared statement (Pl/Java project).
These functions look reasonable, but where is the documentation patch?
I assume it
Thomas, if this is ready for application, would you make some SGML
changes to match, or give me text to add for them. Thanks.
---
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
I need three new functions in the Server Programming Interface (SPI)