Re: [PATCHES] mingw regression test fixes

2004-05-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Claudio Natoli wrote: Peter, did you mean $host_platform by any chance... as originally submitted? I see no use of $build_platform anywhere, and as committed this plain fails. I meant that $build_platform would be better than `uname`, not that my word is to be taken blindly without testing.

Re: [PATCHES] mingw regression test fixes

2004-05-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Claudio Natoli wrote: Peter, did you mean $host_platform by any chance... as originally submitted? I see no use of $build_platform anywhere, and as committed this plain fails. I meant that $build_platform would be better than `uname`, not that my word is to be

Re: [PATCHES] mingw regression test fixes

2004-05-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, I have made this adjustment. Thanks. --- Andrew Dunstan wrote: Claudio Natoli said: For application to HEAD. As Andrew Dunstan appears to have cracked the regression test buffering nut, this patch makes sure

Re: [PATCHES] mingw regression test fixes

2004-04-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Claudio Natoli said: For application to HEAD. As Andrew Dunstan appears to have cracked the regression test buffering nut, this patch makes sure that: * correct platform specific regression files are used under ming * pwd prints out a usable win32 pathname Claudio, I'm assuming that you