Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] External Sort timing debug statements

2005-10-03 Thread Greg Stark
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Applied with revisions: I made it use the VacRUsage code so that we could see both CPU and elapsed time, and moved the report points around a bit. The output with trace_sort enabled looks like this: NOTICE: begin tuple sort: nkeys = 1, workMem = 1024,

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] External Sort timing debug statements

2005-10-03 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not actually involved in this so maybe I'm completely off base here. But wouldn't you want to know how many tuples are being sorted and how many data are being written in these runs in order to be able to actually make sense of these timing