Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.
The actual answer to the question Can I compile PostgreSQL with
Kerberos v5 support? is Yes, why not?. I don't think Can I use
this weird internal private library that
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.
The actual answer to the question Can I compile PostgreSQL with
Kerberos v5 support? is Yes, why not?. I don't think Can I use
this
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.
The actual answer to the question Can I compile PostgreSQL with
Kerberos v5 support? is Yes, why not?. I don't think Can I use
this weird internal private library
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.
Thanks Zdenek
Rich Teer wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2969
Logged by: Rich Teer
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.2
Operating
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.
Thanks Zdenek
Rich Teer wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.
The actual answer to the question Can I compile PostgreSQL with
Kerberos v5 support? is Yes, why not?. I don't think Can I use
this weird internal private library that seems to provide a
