Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
While looking at it the last day or so, I started to think it might be
better to use bison to parse array literals -- or is that a bad idea?
Offhand it doesn't seem like a super-appropriate tool. Once you get
past the lexical details like quo
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While looking at it the last day or so, I started to think it might be
> better to use bison to parse array literals -- or is that a bad idea?
Offhand it doesn't seem like a super-appropriate tool. Once you get
past the lexical details like quoting, the s
Tom Lane wrote:
I had pretty much come to the conclusion that the array_in code should
be thrown away and rewritten from the ground up --- whoever wrote it
originally had no calling as a programmer :-(. I didn't look at the
details of your patch, but I have little faith in half measures in this
ar
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, this is done, but there is still an ugly bug in there (i.e. was
> there prior to my just committed changes and still exists) somewhere
> that I noticed while modifying domain.sql. Namely, if you forget to put
> a delimiter inbetween subarrays in a mul
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If there are no objections, I'll adjust the appropriate regression
script/expected files and commit tonight. And of course I'll follow up
with documentation updates too.
BTW, I believe the plan is to wrap 8.0beta1 tomorrow, so please do get
t
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there are no objections, I'll adjust the appropriate regression
> script/expected files and commit tonight. And of course I'll follow up
> with documentation updates too.
BTW, I believe the plan is to wrap 8.0beta1 tomorrow, so please do get
this in to
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Negative lower bound indicies now work also, and array_out will always
> output explicit dimensions for an array with any dimension having a
> lower bound of other than one.
Seems reasonable to me.
> Any thoughts on whether or not to apply this to 7.4?
Tom Lane wrote:
[ cc'ing pghackers in case anyone wants to object ]
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think that even once we support NULL array elements, they should be
explicitly requested -- i.e. throwing an error on non-rectangular input
is still the right thing to do. I haven't sugges
