Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> consider what would happen if the shared library didn't exist at all and
> only a static version were available. Until this recent batch of pgcrypto
> changes everything built fine.
Well, the right answer to that really is that pgcrypto ought not try to
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The link line says -L/usr/local/lib -lz and libz.a is in /usr/local/lib
> > while libz.so is in /usr/lib.
>
> Well, that is a flat-out configuration error on the local sysadmin's
> part. I can't think of any
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This sure seems like a crude band-aid rather than an actual solution.
>> The bug as I see it is that gcc is choosing to link libz.a rather than
>> libz.so --- why is that happening?
> The link line says -L/usr/local/l
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Kreen writes:
> > I googled a bit and found two suggestions:
> >
> > 1. http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2002-01/0092.html
> > (Use -mimpure-text on linking line)
> >
> This sure seems like a crude band-aid rather than an actual solution.
> The bug as
Marko Kreen writes:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:06:46PM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
>>> Well the buildfarm machine kudu is actually the same machine just building
>>> with the Sun compiler and it works fine. It links all of libz.a into
>>> libpgcrypto.so while gcc refuses to.
>
> I googled a bit
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 08:06:15PM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Marko Kreen wrote:
>
> > [buildfarm machine dragonfly]
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:06:46PM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
> > > Well the buildfarm machine kudu is actually the same machine just
> > > building
>