Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 19:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> > That's a fairly useless place to put it, though, since someone would
> > only think to look at sort_mem if they already had a
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (BTW, is there a reason the docs consistently call them "B-tree
> indexes", not "B+-tree indexes"?)
The latter might be technically more correct, but most people are going
to think it's a typo. I think B-tree is fine for the purposes of our docs.
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 19:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's a fairly useless place to put it, though, since someone would
> only think to look at sort_mem if they already had a clue. It should
> be mentioned under bulk data load (in performance tips chapter)
Attached is a doc patch that does this. The
