Tom Lane írta:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
So I think attaching a precedence to the GENERATED keyword is dangerous.
Especially when we have a good workaround which would just require use
of () around certain postfix-operator expressions.
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I think attaching a precedence to the GENERATED keyword is dangerous.
> Especially when we have a good workaround which would just require use
> of () around certain postfix-operator expressions.
Yeah, I'm leaning to the idea th
Tom Lane wrote:
So I think attaching a precedence to the GENERATED keyword is dangerous.
Especially when we have a good workaround which would just require use
of () around certain postfix-operator expressions.
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)
Zoltan Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane írta:
>> [ a bit alarmed... ] This is only going to be an acceptable solution
>> if you can explain *exactly why* it works. The general story with
>> associativity/precedence declarations is that you are making bison
>> resolve ambiguous s
Tom Lane írta:
Zoltan Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew Dunstan írta:
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
On the other hand, marking GENERATED as %right
solves this issue. I hope it's an acceptable solution.
If anything I should have thought it would be marked %nona
Zoltan Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrew Dunstan írta:
>> Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>>> On the other hand, marking GENERATED as %right
>>> solves this issue. I hope it's an acceptable solution.
>>
>> If anything I should have thought it would be marked %nonassoc.
> That works, too.
Andrew Dunstan írta:
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
On the other hand, marking GENERATED as %right
solves this issue. I hope it's an acceptable solution.
If anything I should have thought it would be marked %nonassoc.
cheers
andrew
That works, too.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
---
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
On the other hand, marking GENERATED as %right
solves this issue. I hope it's an acceptable solution.
If anything I should have thought it would be marked %nonassoc.
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if p
Zoltan Boszormenyi írta:
Martijn van Oosterhout írta:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
The problem comes from cases like
colname coltype DEFAULT 5! GENERATED ...
Since b_expr allows postfix operators, it takes one more token of
lookahead than we have t
