Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Another compelling reason to use SVN is that one of their long term
goals is to use an SQL backend.
That is about as far from a compelling reason to use a particular
version control system as I can imagine.
-Neil
---(end of
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:47:46AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not move it to src/tools, so no one gets the impression that it is
user code?
I thought about that earlier, but concluded it wasn't worth the loss of
CVS history.
I have counted
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can this be discussed for 8.1?
It's been discussed, and rejected, several times already. There aren't
any alternatives that are enough better than CVS to be worth the
changeover effort.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can this be discussed for 8.1?
It's been discussed, and rejected, several times already. There aren't
any alternatives that are enough better than CVS to be worth the
changeover effort.
The effort is not so big:
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane)
transmitted:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can this be discussed for 8.1?
It's been discussed, and rejected, several times already. There
aren't any alternatives that are enough better than CVS to
