Re: [PATCHES] ECPG docs

2006-12-05 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:33:47AM -0500, Chris Browne wrote: I noticed the following error in the chapter on ECPG... ... - The preprocessed file can be compiled normally, for example: + The processed file can be compiled normally, for example: I beg to disagree. ECPG is an embedded SQL

Re: [PATCHES] ECPG docs

2006-12-05 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:40:28PM -0500, Chris Browne wrote: The other option I was thinking of was postprocessed, because the .c file comes *after* processing. Well, the .c file is the one that should be processed. So you have to preprocess the .pc file to get a .c file. Michael -- Michael

[PATCHES] ECPG docs

2006-12-04 Thread Chris Browne
I noticed the following error in the chapter on ECPG... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:pgsql-HEAD/doc/src/sgml cvs diff -u ecpg.sgml Index: ecpg.sgml === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.77 diff -c

Re: [PATCHES] ECPG docs

2006-12-04 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
The original looks more correct to me. After the file has been run through the preprocessor, it becomes preprocessed. Chris Browne wrote: I noticed the following error in the chapter on ECPG... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:pgsql-HEAD/doc/src/sgml cvs diff -u ecpg.sgml Index: ecpg.sgml

Re: [PATCHES] ECPG docs

2006-12-04 Thread Chris Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Heikki Linnakangas) writes: The original looks more correct to me. After the file has been run through the preprocessor, it becomes preprocessed. The other option I was thinking of was postprocessed, because the .c file comes *after* processing. -- let name=cbbrowne and