Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
! where reltype not in
('v','c') and
Surely you meant relkind. Also, there is no 'c' relkind; perhaps you
meant 's'? I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
regards,
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
! where reltype not in
('v','c') and
Surely you meant relkind. Also, there is no 'c' relkind; perhaps you
meant 's'? I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
Yes, sorry,
OK, change made and applied.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here.
Is 't' for toast tables? If so, we should allow 't', no? I
Kenji Sugita writes:
This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
listing.
Why would one want to do that?
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet,
This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
listing.
Index: oid2name.c
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/contrib/oid2name/oid2name.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -r1.18 oid2name.c
---
Kenji Sugita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
listing.
Seems like it'd be a good idea to eliminate views and composite types as
well.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:32:46 -0400
;;; Kenji Sugita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
;;; This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name
;;; listing.
;;;
;;; Seems
