Patches applied. Thanks.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The cause of this is obvious and easy to fix. However I wonder this is
> > because of accidental old or wrong patches. Can you resubmit new patches
> > against CVS Head?
>
> Thanks for yo
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The cause of this is obvious and easy to fix. However I wonder this is
> because of accidental old or wrong patches. Can you resubmit new patches
> against CVS Head?
Thanks for your review. Sorry, it's a wrong patch.
I found another bugs in handling exte
> Here is a updated patch to add query modes into pgbench in order to
> measure performance of simple protocol, extended protocol and
> prepared statements with it.
>
> [PATCHES] Patch for testing query modes on pgbench
> http://momjian.us/mhonarc/patches/msg00335.html
>
&
Here is a updated patch to add query modes into pgbench in order to
measure performance of simple protocol, extended protocol and
prepared statements with it.
[PATCHES] Patch for testing query modes on pgbench
http://momjian.us/mhonarc/patches/msg00335.html
A new runtime option (-M) is added
This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> Here is a patch for testing query modes on pgbench. It is discussed on
> http://archives.p
Here is a patch for testing query modes on pgbench. It is discussed on
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg00755.php
I think this is useful to measure performance of protocols and
prepared statements. I hope the extended protocol will be improved
as fast as the simple protocol.
