On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Neil Conway wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:41 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
There's two almost identical pieces of code in LockRelease and
LockReleaseAll that do the opposite of GrantLock.
Here's a small patch that replaces those pieces with a static UnGrantLock
function.
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
There's two almost identical pieces of code in LockRelease and
LockReleaseAll that do the opposite of GrantLock.
Here's a small patch that replaces those pieces with a static
UnGrantLock function.
Applied to HEAD with a few trivial editorial fixes.
Thanks for the
Hi,
There's two almost identical pieces of code in LockRelease and
LockReleaseAll that do the opposite of GrantLock.
Here's a small patch that replaces those pieces with a static UnGrantLock
function.
This is preparation for the two-phase commit patch, since that introduces
more calls to
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:41 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
There's two almost identical pieces of code in LockRelease and
LockReleaseAll that do the opposite of GrantLock.
Here's a small patch that replaces those pieces with a static UnGrantLock
function.
LockReleaseAll() did not update
