The attached patch removes or minimizes some documentation mentions of
backward compatibility for release 7.2 and earlier. I have not altered
any mentions of release 7.3 or later. The release notes were not
modified, so the changes are still documented, just not in the main
docs.
Patch
The attached patch removes or minimizes some documentation mentions of
backward compatibility for release 7.2 and earlier. I have not altered
any mentions of release 7.3 or later. The release notes were not
modified, so the changes are still documented, just not in the main
docs.
--
Bruce
[ Sorry for the two copies, Bruce: I forgot to CC the list previously ]
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 13:57 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The attached patch removes or minimizes some documentation mentions of
backward compatibility for release 7.2 and earlier.
I don't think it's a net win to get rid of
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think it's a net win to get rid of this text, as it describes
useful alternatives to the GUC variable:
I was about to object to some other parts of the patch on the same
grounds, in particular the changes to ddl.sgml and maintenance.sgml,
and the
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think it's a net win to get rid of this text, as it describes
useful alternatives to the GUC variable:
I was about to object to some other parts of the patch on the same
grounds, in particular the changes to ddl.sgml and
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
currently-useful information is intertwined with the reference to the
old behavior. If you can't be bothered to rewrite to preserve all of
the information, then don't remove the text.
I am working on Neils suggestion. I don't
I have made the modifications you suggested. Any others?
---
Neil Conway wrote:
[ Sorry for the two copies, Bruce: I forgot to CC the list previously ]
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 13:57 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The
