Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
IT
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Si
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > transaction_guarantee.v11.patch
> correct files attached
This is a small fix to transaction_guarantee patch.
WAL writer needs PGSharedMemoryReAttach() on EXEC_BACKEND platforms.
Other changes are only for suppressing warnings.
We might also need to i
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 4. The recent changes to remove CheckpointStartLock haven't changed the
>> code path for deferred transactions, so a similar solution might be
>> possible there also.
> Some further discussion required here, I think. That change may actually
> have intr
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 22:56 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> transaction_guarantee.v11.patch
correct files attached
> Open Questions
> --
>
> 1. Should the DFC use a standard hash table? Custom code allows both
> additional speed and the ability to signal when it fills.
>
> 2. Should tq
