bruce wrote:
>
> Uh, we need a context diff for this.
Uh, never mind. The final version has a context diff.
---
>
> ---
>
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
Uh, we need a context diff for this.
---
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 15:01 +0200, Reviewer wrote:
>
> > I just read your patch in order to understand a little bit what will
> > happen in the next release.
>
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Si
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Si
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:00 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:11:54PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:38 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > One question... can operations that shortcut the WAL by fsyncing direct
> > > to disk also use async commit? I suspe
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:11:54PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:38 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > One question... can operations that shortcut the WAL by fsyncing direct
> > to disk also use async commit? I suspect the answer is an implicit "no"
> > because the only examples
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:38 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> One question... can operations that shortcut the WAL by fsyncing direct
> to disk also use async commit? I suspect the answer is an implicit "no"
> because the only examples I can think of all involve DDL, but it's
> probably worth spelling t
One question... can operations that shortcut the WAL by fsyncing direct
to disk also use async commit? I suspect the answer is an implicit "no"
because the only examples I can think of all involve DDL, but it's
probably worth spelling that out...
--
Jim Nasby [
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:59 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 15:01 +0200, Reviewer wrote:
...A few more minor changes... thanks very much.
I'll wrap these into a final submission with the main patch.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 15:01 +0200, Reviewer wrote:
> I just read your patch in order to understand a little bit what will
> happen in the next release.
Thanks for the review. v2 attached.
> About the guc variable wal_writer_delay, you say at the end:
> "This parameter can only
> + be se
Doc patch only...
To aid with the understanding of the synchronous commit technique, I've
completed the docs prior to the completion of the final version of the
patch.
Any review comments, final doubts etc.., please say them now...
Applies cleanly to CVS HEAD, sgml make OK.
--
Simon Riggs
11 matches
Mail list logo
