Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump -i wording

2008-03-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have developed the attached patch with improves wording for the pg_dump -i (ignore version) option. I think this is going in exactly the wrong direction --- it makes both the documentation and the

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump -i wording

2008-03-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have developed the attached patch with improves wording for the pg_dump -i (ignore version) option. I think this is going in exactly the wrong direction --- it makes both the documentation and the warning message less scary not

[PATCHES] pg_dump -i wording

2008-03-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Simon Riggs wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:20 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Tom Lane wrote: in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard error, rather than something people could override with -i. +1 to this idea. TODO for 8.4? -1 without some more planning

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump -i wording

2008-03-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have developed the attached patch with improves wording for the pg_dump -i (ignore version) option. I think this is going in exactly the wrong direction --- it makes both the documentation and the warning message less scary not more so.