Re: [PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs. multi-master

2006-11-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Markus Schiltknecht wrote: Hi, as promised on -docs, here comes my proposal on how to improve the replication documentation. The patches are split as follows and have to be applied in order: replication_doku_1.diff: Smallest possible one-word change to warm-up... Done.

Re: [PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs. multi-master

2006-11-16 Thread Markus Schiltknecht
Hello Bruce, Bruce Momjian wrote: Actually the patch moves down data paritioning. I am confused. Uh.. yeah, sorry, that's what I meant. I thought a long time about this. I have always liked splitting the solutions up into single and multi-master, but in doing this documentation section, I

Re: [PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs. multi-master

2006-11-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: I didn't mention distributed shared memory as a separate item because I felt it was an implementation detail of clustering, rather than something separate. I kept two-phase in the cluster item for the same reason. Current version at:

Re: [PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs. multi-master

2006-11-16 Thread Markus Schiltknecht
Bruce Momjian wrote: I am now attaching the additional text I added based on your comments. I have also changed the markup so all the solutions appear on the same web page. I think seeing it all together might give us new ideas for improvement. Good, it's definitely better to have it all on

[PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs. multi-master

2006-11-15 Thread Markus Schiltknecht
Hi, as promised on -docs, here comes my proposal on how to improve the replication documentation. The patches are split as follows and have to be applied in order: replication_doku_1.diff: Smallest possible one-word change to warm-up... replication_doku_2.diff: Moves down Clustering