Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4

2004-02-06 Thread Neil Conway
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Taking into account Claudios comments on the previous patch, as well as some more fooling around here of my own, here's a fourth (and final?) one. I'll apply this tonight barring any objections. -Neil ---(end of

[PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4

2004-02-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
Ok, here we go again. Taking into account Claudios comments on the previous patch, as well as some more fooling around here of my own, here's a fourth (and final?) one. If there are no further comments from Claudio or anyone else, I feel this is now ready to be applied. Differences from last

Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4

2004-02-04 Thread Claudio Natoli
IIRC a separate babysitter thread just to handle message passing is exactly what Katie Ward did for UltraSQL ... the Win32 port done at NuSphere. Glad to see she was right about that. Or Katie and I are both wrong :-P Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all