Re: [webmaster] [PATCHES] .pot files are unavailable (?)

2003-06-29 Thread Darko Prenosil
- Original Message - From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 6:55 PM Subject: Re: [webmaster] [PATCHES] .pot files are unavailable (?) It's rumoured that Devrim GUNDUZ once said:

Re: [webmaster] [PATCHES] .pot files are unavailable (?)

2003-06-29 Thread Darko Prenosil
On Sunday 29 June 2003 12:38, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Darko Prenosil writes: What happened with hr_HR translations ? They are in 7.3.2, but missing from current CVS snapshot, and they are not available from the mentioned link either. I also send translations for libpq (that was few days

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Missing array support

2003-06-29 Thread Joe Conway
Joe Conway wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Included in the patch, I changed SQL language functions so that they could be declared with and use polymorphic types. I'm not convinced that will work ... in particular, does the parsetree get fixed correctly when a SQL

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Missing array support

2003-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So I'd propose that we put another check in inline_function(), and reject attempts to inline functions with polymorphic arguments. Seems reasonable. Someday we might want to try to make that work, but not the day before feature freeze...